Don and Cherylyn explained the significant changes to the wind maps and provisions in ASCE 7-16 including the differences between ASCE 7-10 and 7-16 low-rise components and cladding roof pressures. These tests established that the zoning for the roof on these low-slope roof structures was heavily dependent on the building height, h, and much less dependent on the plan dimensions of the building. . Don and Cherylyn explained the significant changes to the wind maps and provisions in ASCE 7-16 including the differences between ASCE 7-10 and 7-16 low-rise components and cladding roof pressures. Meca has developed the MecaWind software, which can make all of these calculations much easier. As you can see in this example, there are many steps involved and it is very easy to make a mistake. Before linking, please review the linking policy. Donald R. Scott, P.E., S.E., F.SEI, F.ASCE, Simpson Strong-Tie Releases New Fastening Systems Catalog Highlighting Robust, Code-Compliant, and Innovative Product Lines, Simpson Strong-Tie Introduces Next-Generation, Easy-to-Install H1A Hurricane Tie Designed for Increased Resiliency and Higher Allowable Loads Using Fewer Fasteners, Holcim US Advances Sustainability Commitment with Expansion of ECOPactLow-Carbon Concrete, Simpson Strong-Tie Introduces Titen HD Heavy-Duty Mechanically Galvanized Screw Anchor, Code Listed for Exterior Environments. Calculate structural loadings for the International Building Code (2000 - 2021), ASCE 7 (1998 - 2016) & NFPA 5000 plus state codes based on these codes such as California, Florida, Ohio, etc. Click below to see what we've got in our regularly updated calculation library. Enter information below to subscribe to our newsletters. ASCE/SEI 7-16 (4 instead of 3), the net difference is difficult to compare. To be considered a low rise, the building must be enclosed (this is true), the h <= 60 ft [18] (this is true) and the h<= least horizontal width. WIND LOADING ANALYSIS - MWFRS and Components/Cladding. ASCE 7-16 Gable Roof Coefficients 20- to 27-degree slope. Further testing is currently underway for open structures, and these results will hopefully be included in future editions of the Standard. Examples and companion online Excel spreadsheets can be used to accurately and efficiently calculate wind loads . Login. ASCE-7-16 & 7-10 Wall Components & Cladding Wall Wind Pressure Calculator Use this tool to calculate wall zones 4 & 5 positive & negative ASD design wind pressures for your project. Wind loads on Main Wind Force Resisting Systems (MWFRS) are obtained by using the directional procedure of ASCE 7-16, as the example building is an open building. Analytical procedures provided in Parts 1 through 6, as appropriate, of . Example of ASCE 7-16 Figure 29.4-7 Excerpt for rooftop solar panel design wind loads.Printed with permission from ASCE. Wind Design for Components and Cladding Using ASCE 7-16 (AWI050817) CEU:0.2 On-Demand Webinar | Online Individual (one engineer) Member $99.00 | Non-Member $159.00 Add to Cart Tag (s) Architectural, Structural, On-Demand, On-Demand Webinar Description View Important Policies and System Requirements for this course. Fortunately, there is an easier way to make this conversion. Airfield Pavement Condition Assessment - Manual or Automated? Network and interact with the leading minds in your profession. ASCE 7-16 will introduce a fourth enhancement zone for roof attachment, in addition to the traditional industry standard perimeter, corner, and ridge zones used . Program incorporates all roof types and combinations defined in ASCE 7-05 or ASCE 7-10/16, Chapters 27-28. The adjustment can be substantial for locations that are located at higher elevations. The tool provides hazard data for all eight environmental hazards, including wind, tornado, seismic, ice, rain, flood, snow and tsunami. - Main Wind Force Resisting Wystem (MWFRS) - Components & Cladding (C&C) The software has the capability to calculate loads per: - ASCE 7-22 - ASCE 7-16 - ASCE 7-10 (version dependent) - ASCE 7-05 (version dependent) - Florida Building . These changes are illustrated in Figure 1. Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-16, focusing on the provisions that affect the planning, design, and construction of buildings for residential and commercial purposes. Related Papers. Table 26.9-1 ASCE 7-16 ground elevation factor. In some cases not shown in Table 1, such as for Zone 1, the revised coefficients produce an approximate doubling of roof pressures. Most of the figures for C&C start at 10 sq ft [0.9 sq m] and so for the purpose of this example we will consider an effective area of 10 sq ft for all wall and roof wind zones. Pressure increases vary by zone and roof slope. Wind loads on components and cladding on all buildings and other structures shall be designed using one of the following procedures: 1. In the 2018 International Residential Code (IRC), ASCE 7-16 is referenced as one of several options where wind design is required in accordance with IRC. and he has coauthored Significant Changes to the Minimum Design Load Provisions of ASCE 7-16 and authored Significant Changes to the Wind Load Provisions of ASCE 7-10: An Illustrated Guide. We are looking at pressures for all zones on the wall and roof. Table 29.1-2 in the ASCE 7-16 [1] outlines the necessary steps to determining the wind loads on a circular tank structure according to the Main Wind Force Resisting System (MWFRS). As an example, a roof joist that spans 30 ft and are spaced 5 ft apart would have a length of 30 ft and the width would be the greater of 5 ft or 30 ft / 3 = 10 ft. ASCE 7 Hazard Tool. View More View Less. This limitation was removed in ASCE 7-16, and thus the provisions apply to rooftop equipment on buildings of all heights. Reprinting or other use of these materials without express permission of NCSEA is prohibited. All materials contained in this website fall under U.S. copyright laws. The simplified procedure is for building with a simple diaphragm, roof slope less than 10 degrees, mean roof height less than 30 feet (9 meters), regular shape rigid building, no expansion joints, flat terrain and not subjected to special wind condition. When you ask for FORTIFIED, you're asking for a collection of construction upgrades that work together to protect your home from severe weather. Design Example Problem 1a 3. Level 2 framing: a. S2.02 grid F/1.7-3.3 - This is a teeter-totter . The new ASCE 7-16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (Standard) is adopted into the 2018 International Building Code (IBC) and is now hitting your desks. The wind speeds in the northern Great Plains region remain approximately the same as in ASCE 7-10. This is considered a Simplified method and is supposed to be easier to calculate by looking up values from tables. 1609.1.1 Determination of Wind Loads. Case 3: 75% wind loads in two perpendicular directions simultaneously. The analytical procedure is for all buildings and non-building structures. Chapter 30 Part 4 was the other method we could use. Step 1: The Risk Category is determined from Table 1.5-1 [1] based on the use or occupancy of the building. Quickly retrieve site structural design parameters specified by ASCE 7-10, ASCE 7-16, and ASCE 7-20, including wind, seismic, snow, ice, rain, flood . Also, a small revision was made to the hurricane wind speeds in the Northeast region of the country based upon updated hurricane models. Figure 3. Table 1. Component and cladding (C&C) roof pressures changed significantly in ASCE 7-16, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. They also covered the wind chapter changes between ASCE 7-16 and 7-22 including the tornado provisions. Methods Using the 2018 IBC and ASCE/SEI 7-16 contains simplied, step-by-step procedures that can be applied to main wind force resisting systems and components and cladding of building and nonbuilding structures. Using Method 1: Simplified Procedure (Section 6.4) Civil Engineering Resources. MWFRS and components and cladding Wind load cases Example - low-rise building - Analytical method ASCE 7-16 is referenced in the 2018 International Building Code (IBC) for wind loads. Contact [email protected] . ASCE 7-10 Gable Roof Coefficients 20- to 27-degree slope. The changes recently adopted for use in ASCE 7-16 will be a prominent part of the material. Components and Cladding (Chapter 30) Design wind pressures for components and cladding shall be based on the exposure category resulting in the highest wind loads for any wind direction at the site. Implementation, River Restoration with Large Wood - Detailed Design and Construction, Roadway Construction Inspection Techniques to Minimize Life-Cycle Costs, Roadway Construction Quality Control and Inspection Techniques for Asphalt Surfaced Pavements, Roadway Construction Quality Control and Inspection Techniques for Concrete Surfaced Pavements, Roller-Compacted Concrete Pavements - Applications and Guidance, School Zones - A Comprehensive Look at Signs, Markings ,and Safety Programs, Scope Creep: Focus on Prevention and Improve Project Performance, Sediment Characteristics, Sources, and Movement, Seismic Assessment and Design of Water and Sewer Pipelines, Seismic Assessment and Strengthening of Buildings and Structures in Areas of Low to Moderate Seismicity, Seismic Design of Steel Horizontal, Saddle-Support Tanks, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings: An Overview of Changes to the New ASCE 41-13, Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings Using ASCE 41-13 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Procedures, Seismic Screening of Buildings Using ASCE 41-13, Selected Topics Regarding Geosynthetic Clay Liners, Setting and Achieving Personal and Organization Goals, Ship/Tow Simulation of Navigation Design Studies: Interpreting U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirements, Significant Changes to Tensile Membrane Structures, ASCE 55-16, Significant Changes to the General Requirements for Determining Windloads of ASCE 7-10, Significant Changes to the Wind Load Design Procedures of ASCE 7-10, Significant Changes to the Wind Load Provisions of ASCE 7-10 and Coordination with the 2015 IBC and 2015 IRC, Significant Changes to the Wind Load Provisions of ASCE 7-16, S-N Curves for Metal Fatigue, Best Practices, Origins, and Limitations, Snow and Rain Loads in ASCE 7-16: What's New and Different, Snow Loading for Non-Standard Roof Shapes, Soil Improvement Technical Committee Presentation on Soil Improvement, Soil Liquefaction Risk Mitigation Using Earthquake Drains and Other Drainage Techniques, Solving Problems and Pursuing Opportunities, Speaking - How to Prepare and Deliver a Convincing Presentation, Steel Structures On-Demand Webinar Package, Stormwater Infiltration Basin Design - Design Considerations and Example Projects, Stormwater Management On-Demand Webinar Package, Stream Restoration - In-Channel Structure Design and Placement, Stream Restoration - Proper Channel Sizing and the Significance for Future Channel Stability, Stream Restoration and Bioengineered Bank Stabilization - Fundamental Concepts, Stream Restoration Bioengineered Retaining Walls for Riverbank Stabilization, Stream Restoration On-Demand Webinar Package, Stream Restoration: What Works and What Doesn't Work, Structural Building Condition Surveys: Looking for Trouble, Structural Considerations for Building Additions, Structural Design of Steel Stairs and Rails, Structural Supports for Rooftop-Mounted Equipment, Structural Testing of Curtain Wall Systems, Structural Thermal Bridging in the Building Envelope, Supporting Suspended Loads from Building Structural Elements, Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Coal Combustion Products Part II of VI, Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Construction Using Recycled Materials Part I of VI, Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Foundry Byproducts Part IV of VI, Sustainable Geotechnical Applications On-Demand Webinar Package, Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Recycled Base Aggregates in Pavement Applications Part III of VI, Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Sustainability & Life Cycle Analysis of Recycled Materials - Part VI of VI, Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Tire Derived Aggregate in Geotechnical and Environmental Applications- Part V of VI, Sustainable Infrastructure Using Envision to Plan, Design and Rate Infrastructure Projects, Sustainable Sediment Management for Navigation Projects, Target Zero Injuries - Developing a Comprehensive Safety Program for Engineers and Constructors, The First Three Rules of Construction - Document, Document, Document, The Five Habits of Highly Effective Marketers, The Five Most Common Errors Made During Bridge Inspections, The Impact of Design, Construction and Maintenance Features on the Long-Term Performance of Pavements, The Importance of Floodplain Design in Stream Restoration, River Stablization and Flood Damage Mitigation Projects, The Integration of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Modeling Tools in Water Treatment Plant Design, The Measurement of Soil Suction in the Field for Geotechnical Engineering Applications, The Pricing of Delay Costs for Construction Projects, The Road Safety and Signage Audit - Proactive Roadway Safety in the 21st Century, The Role of the Specialty Engineer (From the Wood Truss Industry's Perspective), The Seismic Coefficient Method for Slope and Retaining Wall Design, Thin Pavement Surface Treatments to Improve Friction and Reduction Moisture Infiltration, Tornado Design Using ASCE 7-16 Commentary, Traffic Studies for Implementing Short-Term and Long-Range Roadway Improvements, Traffic Volume Data Collection: A Practical Guide, Transforming Urban Water Management - A New Strategy Explored, Transit Signal Preemption and Priority Treatments, Transportation Infrastructure Considerations for Super Heavy Load Moves, Troubleshooting Unsteady Flow HEC-RAS Models, Underground Construction Engineering Technical Committee Presentation on Recent Advancements in Underground Engineering and Construction, Underpinning and Strengthening of Foundations, Understanding HEC-RAS Errors, Warnings and Notes, Upcoming Revisions ASTME 1527 Standard Practice for Environmental Sites Assessment, Use of Geosynthetics for Waterproofing Critical Hydraulic Structures, Using HEC-RAS 5.0 for a Coupled 1D/2D Analysis, Using HEC-RAS 5.0 for Two Dimensional Hydraulic Analyses, Using HEC-RAS 5.0.7 for Two Dimensional Hydraulic Analyses, Using Nonlinear Analysis and Fiber Wrap Material for Efficient Seismic Retrofit, Using Technology to Mitigate Wet Weather Overflows and Reduce Infiltration and Inflow (I/I), Utilizing Drones to Improve Bridge Inspection Results, Verification of Computer Calculations by Approximate Methods, Vibration of Concrete Floors - Evaluation, Acceptance and Control, Visualizing Information for First Responders, Waste and By-Product Use in Road Construction, Water Balance Modeling for Alternative Covers, Whole Building Lifecycle Assessment: Quantifying Impacts of Construction Materials, Wind Design for Components and Cladding Using ASCE 7-16, Wind Design for Non-Residential Wood Structures, Wind Loading: MWFRS and C&C Approach for Non-Rectangular Low-Rise Buildings, Wood Structures On-Demand Webinar Package, Working Smarter - Using Brain Basics to Enhance Individual and Organizational Performance, Writing: How to Engage and Convince Your Readers. Hip roofs have several additional configurations that were not available in previous editions of ASCE 7. Experience STRUCTURE magazine at its best! Before linking, please review the linking policy. Skip to content. Stringers at elevations 10 m, 6.8 m, and 5.20 m (as shown in Fig. Join the discussion with civil engineers across the world. There are two methods provided in the new Standard. Let us know what calculations are important to you. In Equation 16-16, . Which is Best? Examples of components are girts & purlins, fasteners. . For example, in Denver, CO, the Mile High City, the ground elevation factor, Ke, is 0.82 which translates to an 18% reduction in design wind pressures. . This value is then multiplied by the value obtained from Fig 30.4-1. | Privacy Policy. Users can enter in a site location to get wind speeds and topography factors, enter in building parameters and generate the wind pressures. 2 Wind Design Manual Based on 2018 IBC and ASCE/SEI 7-16 OUTLINE 1. Two methods for specific types of panels have been added. Wall Design Force ASCE 7-16 12.11.1 Inside of building Parapet force to use for designing wall. ICC 500-2020 also requires that floor live loads for tornado shelters be assembly occupancy live loads (e.g., 100 psf in the case of ASCE 7-16) and floor live loads for hurricane . Step 3: Wind load parameters are the same as earlier. Access the. There is no audio, it is just a 2.5 minute video showing how you enter Part 1 and then switch to Part 4 for the results. Research became available for the wind pressures on low-slope canopies during this last code cycle of the Standard. See ASCE 7-16 for important details not included here. We will first perform the calculations manually, and then show how the same calculations can be performed much easier using the. The reduced pressures for hip roofs in ASCE 7-16 are finally able to be demonstrated in Table 2; the design premise for hip roofs has always suggested this roof shape has lower wind pressures, but the C&C tables used for design did not support that premise until this new ASCE 7-16 edition. Apply wind provisions for components and cladding, solar collectors, and roof mounted equipment. ASCE 7-16 defines Components and Cladding (C&C) as: "Elements of the building envelope or elements of building appurtances and rooftop structures and equipment that do not qualify as part of the MWFRS (Main Wind Force Resisting System)." In simple terms, C&C would be considered as windows, doors, the siding on a house, roofing material, etc.. The first method applies These provisions give guidance to the users of ASCE 7 that has been missing in the past. The ASCE7-16 code utilizes the Strength Design Load also called (LRFD Load Resistance Design Load) method and the Allowable Stress Design Load (ASD) method. MecaWind can do a lot of the busy work for you, and let you just focus on your inputs and outputs. The added pressure zones and EWA changes have complicated the application of these changes for the user. Easy to use structural design tools for busy engineers ClearCalcs makes structural calculations easy for a wide range of engineers, architects, and designers across the world. Figure 1. Here are the input and output files associated with these examples: Chapter 30 Part 1: Input File Output PDF File, Chapter 30 Part 4: Input File Output PDF File. Explain differences in building characteristics and how those differences influence the approach to wind design. Wind Loads on Rooftop Solar Panels (ASCE 7-16 Sections 29.4.3 and 29.4.4) New provisions for determining wind loads on rooftop solar panels have been added to ASCE 7-16. Chapter 30 of ASCE 7-16 provides the calculation methods for C&C, but which of the seven (7) parts in this section do we follow? ASCE 7-16 describes the means for determining design loads including dead, live, soil, flood, tsunami, snow, rain, atmospheric ice, earthquake, wind, and fire, as well as how to assess load combinations. This will give us the most conservative C&C wind pressure for each zone. About this chapter: Chapter 16 establishes minimum design requirements so that the structural components of buildings are proportioned to resist the loads that are likely to be encountered. The component and cladding pressure coefficients, ( GCp ), for roofs on buildings with an h < 60 feet, have been revised significantly in ASCE 7-16. Wind speeds in the Midwest and west coast are 5-15 mph lower in ASCE 7-16 than in ASCE 7-10. presents the Beta release of the ASCE 7-16 wind load program to calculate the design pressures for your project. MWFRS is defined as " (a)n assemblage of structural elements to provide support and stability for the overall structure." Step 4: For walls and roof we are referred to Table 30.6-2. As illustrated in Table 2, the design wind pressures can be reduced depending on location elevation, wind speed at the site location, exposure and height above grade, and roof shape. For gable and hip roofs, in addition to the changes in the number of the roof wind pressure zones, the smallest and largest effective wind areas (EWA) have changed. Wind tunnel tests are used 10 predict the wind loads and responses of a structure, structural components, and cladding to a variety of wind c ditions. Read Article Download. Since we have GCp values that are postive and negative, and our GCpi value is also positive and negative, we take the combinations that produce the largest positive value and negative value for pressure: p1 = qh*(GCp GCpi) = 51.1 * (0.3 (-0.18)) = 24.53 psf (Zone 1), p2 = 51.1*(-1.1 (+0.18)) = -65.41 (Zone 1). Each of these revisions is intended to improve the safety and reliability of structures while attempting to reduce conservatism as much as possible. As described above, revised roof construction details to accommodate increased roof wind pressures include revised fastener schedules for roof sheathing attachment, revised sheathing thickness requirements, and framing and connection details for overhangs at roof edge zones.. To resist these increased pressures, it is expected that roof designs will incorporate changes such as more fasteners, larger fasteners, closer spacing of fasteners, thicker sheathing, increased framing member size, more closely spaced roof framing, or a change in attachment method (e.g., change smooth shank nails to ring shank nails or screws). An additional point I learned at one of the ASCE seminars is that . Consequently, wind speeds generally decrease across the country, except along the hurricane coastline from Texas to North Carolina. ASCE 7 Main Wind Force Resisting Systemss, MWFRS, Components and Cladding, C&C, wind load pressure calculator for windload solutions. When calculating C&C pressure, the SMALLER the effective area the HIGHER the wind pressure. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. This revision in zone designations was required because the values in zones around the roof in previous editions of the Standard were shown as having the same pressure coefficient, i.e., corners at the eave versus corners at the ridge have been found to have varying pressures. This Table compares results between ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16 based on 140 mph wind speeds in Exposure C using the smallest EWA at 15-foot mean roof height in Zone 2. 2.8 ). Because the building is open and has a pitched roof, there . Table 30.6-2 (above) refers us to Fig 30.4-1, which is shown below. Calculation and Applying Design Wind Loads on Buildings Using the Envelope Procedure of ASCE 7-10, Calculation and Applying Design Wind Loads on Buildings Using the Envelope Procedure of ASCE 7-16, Calculation and use of Time Concentration, Change and Claim Management resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic, Changes to the Nonbuilding Structures Provisions in ASCE 7-10, Changes to the Nonbuilding Structures Provisions in ASCE 7-16, Chasing the Automobile - History of Pavement Design and Construction in the United States, Citizen Traffic-Related Requests - A Correspondence Guide for Working with Residents, Communication Skills On-Demand Webinar Package, Complete Streets and Pavement Preservation-Linking Planning and Public Works for Better Communities and Better Infrastructure, Complying with the MUTCD - Traffic Signing for Horizontal Curves, Computational Geotechnics Technical Committee Presentation on Numerical Analysis of Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, Concrete and Masonry Structures On-Demand Webinar Package, Condition Evaluation of Existing Structures - Concrete and Steel, Condition Evaluation of Existing Structures - Masonry and Wood, Connected Automated Vehicles Past, Present and Future, Connected Vehicles, Smarter Cities, & Modern Signal Timing - How Traffic Engineering Strategies Will Change in the Years Ahead, Connection Solutions for Wood Framed Structures, Construction and Management of Sidewalks and Recreational Trails, Construction Inspection of Geosynthetic Reinforced Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Walls, Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) Contracting in Transportation Infrastructure Programs, Continuous Pavement Deflection Testing and Its Implementation in Pavement Management, Contributors to Speed and Considerations for Speed Management, Cost Justification for Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure: Data Driven Economic Analysis for Project Decision Support - Part I, Cost Justification for Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure: Data Driven Economic Analysis for Project Decision Support - Part II, Cost-Effective Assessment of Pavement Condition, Culvert Design for Fish Passage - Concepts and Fundamentals, Culvert Design for Fish Passage - Design Steps and Examples, Curtainwall Primer for Design Professionals, Decentralized Recharge and Reuse - Innovative Wastewater Systems, Deflection Calculation of Concrete Floors, Delegation - Improve Your and Their Productivity, Design of Building Foundations - Practical Basics, Design of Building Structures for Serviceability, Design of Foundations for Coastal Flooding, Design of Foundations for Equipment Support, Design of Geomembranes for Surface Impoundments (Ponds, Reservoirs, etc. Quantification of Numeric Model Uncertainty and Risk, Radar Rainfall Estimation for Modeling and Design, Reach-Scale Design for River Rehabilitation with Large Wood, Recycled Base Aggregates in Pavement Applications, Recycled Materials in Transportation Geotechnical Applications, Redeveloping Roadways for the Urban Core within Constrained Right-of-Ways, Regulatory and Warning Signs - Providing Answers to Common Citizen Requests, Reinforced Masonry Design and Construction, Release the Leader Within You and Others: The 7 Qualities of Effective Leaders, Risk and Uncertainty Principles for Flood Control Projects - Understanding the Basics, River Information Services: Basics of RIS and Plans for U.S. One new clarification is that the basic design wind speed for the determination of the wind loads on this equipment needs to correspond to the Risk Category of the building or facility to which the equipment provides a necessary service. A Monoslope roof with a slope between 3 deg and 10 deg follows Fig 30.3-5A. See ASCE 7-16 for important details not included here. Referring to this table for a h = 40 ft and Exposure C, we get a Lambda value of 1.49. Printed with permission from ASCE. The significance of these changes is the increase in pressures that must be resisted by roof construction elements subject to component and cladding wind loads including but not limited to roof framing and connections, sheathing, and attachment of sheathing to framing. An example of these wind pressure increases created by the increase in roof pressure coefficients is illustrated in Table 1. Provides a composite drawing of the structure as the user adds sections. Wind pressures have increased in the hurricane-prone regions where Exposure C is prevalent and wind speeds are greater. This means that if a cooling tower is located on an administration building (Risk Category II) of a hospital but serves the surgery building (Risk Category IV) of the hospital, the wind loads determined for the cooling tower would be based on the Risk Category IV wind speed map. Major revisions to ASCE 7-16 that affect the wind design of buildings have been highlighted. Components and cladding for buildingswhich includes roof systemsare allowed to be designed using the Allowable Stress Design (ASD) method. In addition, this chapter assigns buildings and structures to risk categories that are indicative of their intended use. FORTIFIED Realizes Different Homes have Different Needs . Calculate Wind Pressure for Components and Cladding 2) Design the Roof Truss and Purlins per NSCP 2015/AISC 3) . There are also many minor revisions contained within the new provisions. The most significant reduction in wind speeds occurs in the Western states, which decreased approximately 15% from ASCE 7-10 (Figures 1 and 2).
Dumont, Nj Stabbing, Articles A