When comparing the NIV with the King James Version (KJV), it would seem that there are some verses missing in the NIV (and other trusted translations such as the CEV, CSB, ESV, GNB, HCSB, NET, NLT, etc.). After Luther's rejection, the Catholic Church added them to the Council of Trent. Why does the KJV use (singular) "cometh" as the verb for (plural) "distress and anguish" in Proverbs 1:27? Is the King James Version the only Bible we should use? No papyrus contains any portion of the 12 verses.[88]. "[47] The verses immediately before verse 24, the verse 24 itself, and the verses following verse 24 show many variations in the surviving manuscripts. They are powerful. RV: And as they went out, they besought that these words might be spoken to them the next sabbath. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. "It's not meant to replace your current version of . (Some say "it stood" the he or it being the Dragon mentioned in the preceding verses) Among pre-KJV versions, the Great Bible and the Rheims version also have "he stood". Author. from your pastor, priest, or other trustworthy counselor, We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup, Acceptable comments policy for Christianity Stack Exchange. So looking onwards, to Joel and Malachi, to see which is 3 and which is 4. ), who changed it, and why? for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the . Brill); David Alan Black & Jacob N. Cerone, eds., The Pericope of the Adulteress in Contemporary Research (2016, London & NY, Bloomsbury T&T Clark); John David Punch, The Pericope Adulterae: Theories of Insertion & Omission (2012, Saarbruken, Lap Lambert Academic Publ'g. New King James Version. (2 Samuel 12:23) But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? The apocrypha is a selection of books which were published in the original 1611 King James Bible. Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is. The same words appear in Matthew 22:14. (2 Samuel 12:24) And David comforted Bath-sheba his wife, and went in unto her, and lay with her: and she bare a son, and he called his name Solomon: and the LORD loved him. But the words quoted above complicate this story by asserting that miraculous cures were already taking place at this pool in the absence of Jesus, owing to the unpredictable intervention of an (apparently invisible) angel. It was a gift handed to Queen Elizabeth on her coronation and described as such. Eberhard and Erwin Nestle (early editions) and Kurt and Barbara Aland, et al. From the Baptist perspective: Does Leviticus 20:13 prove that God is advocating for the murder of homosexuals? Twitter. Since the KJV text was completed in the early 1600s, we have discovered manuscripts of the Bible that are older and believed to be more accurate than the manuscripts that were used to translate the KJV. The reason is that the modern versions are made from more reliable manuscripts than the KJV, which was made from 10th century codex. "[67] The same two sentences do appear, without any quibbling about their authenticity, in Matthew 10:1415, and it is plausible that some very early copyist assimilated the sentence into Mark, perhaps as a sidenote subsequently copied into the main text. why does the kjv have extra verses. (Note: not only is verse 4 omitted, but also the tail end of verse 3.). LDS perspective on the New King James Version? Latin, Syriac, and others - and does not appear until H,L, and P (all 9th century). ", Acts 8:37: "And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. This verse is missing from Tyndale's version (1534) and the Geneva Bible (1557). After all, if inspiration implies preservation, and preservation implies accessibility, accessibility of meaning is just as important as accessibility of words. Answer: 1 John 5:7 belongs in the King James Bible and was preserved by faithful Christians. Kurt Aland & Barbara Aland, The Text of The New Testament (rev. why does the kjv have extra versesnevada board of pharmacy regulations. It is included in mss only slightly less ancient, A,D,K,W,1,13, Italic mss, the Vulgate, some other ancient versions. And why was it changed? (There are 155,683 words in the Apocrypha, the group of books that was almost always printed as part of the KJV Bible until late last century.) Philippians 2:4 - Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others. KJV: 16 for many be called, but few chosen. "[76] However, the RV's text is that of the earliest and most esteemed mss - p74, ,A,B,C,D, and many others, including the Vulgate and other ancient versions; the appearance of the words for Jews and for Gentiles (ethna) occurs in Codices and P (both ninth cent.) In several passages ( Numbers 23:22, 24:8; Deuteronomy 33:17; Job 39:9-10; Psalm 22:21, 29:6; Isaiah 34:7 ), the King James Version of the Bible mentions a unicorn. As it forms an independent narrative, it seems to stand best alone at the end of the Gospels with double brackets to show its inferior authority " Some English translations based on Westcott & Hort imitate this practice of appending the pericope at the end of the Gospel (e.g., The Twentieth Century New Testament), while others simply omit it altogether (e.g., Goodspeed, Ferrar Fenton, the 2013 revision of The New World Version). The additional books in the Catholic Bible are found in the Old . No, it is not true. [3] And they laid hands on them, and put them in hold unto the next day: for it was now eventide. I have found the relationship to be the following https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leningrad_Codex "The Westminster Leningrad Codex is an online digital version of the Leningrad Codex.transcribed from BHS". It is, however, found in this place in some Greek mss not quite so ancient C, D, K, L as well as some other mss of the ancient versions. Check it out at the bottom of this article. And he brought forth the spoil of the city in great abundance. . Thats called meditation. As far as I am concerned, there is no such thing as silent prayer. Here is a whole series of lecture on Bible translations by Dan Wallace, that answers this. It is believed probable that the clause was inserted here by assimilation because the corresponding version of this narrative, in Matthew, contains a somewhat similar rebuke to the Devil (in the KJV, "Get thee hence, Satan,"; Matthew 4:10, which is the way this rebuke reads in Luke 4:8 in the Tyndale [1534], Great Bible (also called the Cranmer Bible) [1539], and Geneva [1557] versions), whose authenticity is not disputed, and because the very same words are used in a different situation in Matthew 16:23 and Mark 8:33. The translators claim at least 40000 mistakes in the KJV. Innovations in use of Chapter and Verse Numbers This abrupt ending may have been a deliberate choice of St. Mark or because the last part of his writing (after verse 8) was somehow separated from the rest of his manuscript and was lost (an alternative theory is that St. Mark died before finishing his Gospel). "[91] This might be thought an authoritative statement but Jerome compromised it by including the Longer Ending, without any apparent notation about doubting it, in his Latin Vulgate, and Burgon (among others) thinks this inclusion is an endorsement of its authenticity. This is true, but a little investigation will show that great ignorance still exists on the subject among the less-informed in the Christian community. You can use this space to go into a little more detail about your company. Reason: Many (perhaps most) modern versions emulate the Revised Version and simply omit the sentence in question, without any explanatory comment. The earliest Greek Codex showing this pericope at all is D (Codex Bezae), of the 5th or 6th century - but the text in D has conspicuous variants from the Textus Receptus/KJV version,[137] and some Old Latin manuscripts no older than the 5th century, and many subsequent Greek and Latin mss all at the familiar location following John 7:52. (2 Samuel 12:27) And Joab sent messengers to David, and said, I have fought against Rabbah, and have taken the city of waters. My code is GPL licensed, can I issue a license to have my code be distributed in a specific MIT licensed project? rev2023.3.3.43278. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Fifty four (although only 47 finished) of the most highly respected theologians, linguists and academics were given this task of publishing the most accurate and comprehensive version of the Bible. In the case of Codex A and C, the manuscripts are damaged so that the actual text of John 7:538:11 is missing but the surrounding text does not leave enough space for the pericope to have been present. why does the kjv have extra verses. This is suitable for older children as well as adults. Jerome was the first to describe the extra 7 Old Testament books as the "Apocrypha" (doubtful authenticity). 41 changes out of 354 words equals a ratio of 1:8.63. What are the major criticisms of the NIV? Scrivener, usually regarded as a defender of the KJV text, said of this verse, "The authenticity of [this verse] will, perhaps, no longer be maintained by anyone whose judgment ought to have weight; but this result has been arrived at after a long and memorable controversy, which helped keep alive, especially in England, some interest in Biblical studies. As this wikipedia page indicates, this is a variance between the Majority Text and the Textus Receptus. I will update the question again accordingly to take this into account, as we now have a source for the KJV's chapter divisions. So David and all the people returned unto Jerusalem. 1987, Grand Rapids, Eerdmans) pages 303304. (2 Samuel 12:25) And he sent by the hand of Nathan the prophet; and he called his name Jedidiah, because of the LORD. ta petro employee handbook. 1 According to the software program, Accordance, the KJV has 585, 761 words in the 39 books of the Old Testament that are accepted by Protestants as canonical; the KJV has 180,376 words in the New Testament.This comes out to a total of 766,137 words, or 25,191 words shorter than the number provided by Scott. Out of the 421 total changes amounting to only five one-hundredths of a percent, the following should be noted -. Some of these lists of "missing verses" specifically mention "sixteen verses" although the lists are not all the same. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. It is not present in the oldest manuscripts of Matthew, but there are versions that include it, so again it is a matter of judgement between the two sets of translators as to which text version is "better". Its source might be indicated by Eusebius (early 4th century), in his Historia Ecclesia, book 3, sec. Whether those errors crept into handwritten copies or printed copies, the principle is still the same. Brooke Foss Westcott & Fenton John Anthony Hort, The New Testament in the Original Greek (1881, Cambridge & London, Macmillan & Co.) vol. ", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_New_Testament_verses_not_included_in_modern_English_translations&oldid=1141229464, This page was last edited on 24 February 2023, at 00:55. [125] The omission of the Longer Ending in the Codex Vaticanus apparently was not realized again until rediscovered in 1801 by the Danish scholar Andreas Birch (whose discovery got very little publicity owing to a fire that destroyed his newly published book before it could be much distributed). I watched the film on YouTube with great interest. Each group individually and collectively analysed every available manuscript (of which there are currently about 5,200 separate documents in the world) and created what is accepted as the most comprehensive Biblical document available. Actually, Greek codex W (also known as the Freer Gospels or the Codex Washingtonianus), dating from the fourth or fifth century, is the oldest known Greek ms that sets forth the Longer Ending[95] and it contains a lengthy addition (which appears nowhere else), known as the Freer Logion, between the familiar verses 14 and 15. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. This list was finally approved by Pope Damasus I in 382 AD, and was formally approved by the Church Council of Rome in that same year. Differs from the King James Bible in the New Testament. [9] Some Greek editions published well before the 1881 Revised Version made similar omissions. Study this Book of Instruction continually. Acts 28:29. Why does the KJV put "mine" in italics in Deuteronomy 8:17? And its not simply getting wound up about some kind of conspiracy theory. Screen Printing and Embroidery for clothing and accessories, as well as Technical Screenprinting, Overlays, and Labels for industrial and commercial applications Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof. Only 421 changes to the KJV equals an average of one change per 1880 words. Browse other questions tagged, Like any library, Christianity Stack Exchange offers great information, but, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. And we know it's the original one. [92] It has been suggested or suspected that Jerome's expression of doubt was actually a rehash of the similar comment by Eusebius,[93] but, to the contrary, it is possible that Jerome was unaware of this particular opinion of Eusebius, considering that it was utterly unknown to modern scholars until its fortuitous discovery in 1825. Most critical editions relegated the Comma to a footnote or otherwise marked it as doubtful. ", Mark 15:28: "And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with the transgressors. [74] The 18th century Bible scholar, Johann David Michaelis, wrote (c.1749), "[This] long passage has been found in not a single Greek manuscript, not even in those which have been lately [ca. Why do the KJV and BHS(Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia) have a different number of chapters in Joel and Malachi? According to Reuss, the 1849 Greek New Testament of Tischendorf was the first to remove these verses from the main text.[83]. A. Alexander (1857) suggested that this verse, though genuine, was omitted by many scribes, "as unfriendly to the practice of delaying baptism, which had become common, if not prevalent, before the end of the 3rd century."[41]. From 1611 until now, the King James Bible has undergone a grand total of 421 word changes, amounting to only five one-hundredths of a percent of the text! "from evil" (KJV) versus "from the evil one" (NIV). The King James Bible of 1611 was printed in the GOTHIC TYPE FACE! If the Bible has been changed over the years, can we still trust it? Psalm 121:1-3. and Codex Athous Laurae ("") (8th or 9th century); in the first three it is preceded with a copyist's note about being found in only some manuscripts, in it follows verse 8 without such a note, and in all four the Shorter Ending is followed by the Longer Ending. Unlike the Dan Browns theories the Rose Line or Sangreal, the Bible is the most powerful book in human existence and therefore, only those who are intent on diminishing its powers would ever want to change it. But there is a difference in meaning: if it's masculine, then it's referring to a specific individual who is evil, "the evil one", but if it's neuter, then it means non-personified "evil" in general. The Revised Version (1881) omitted the italicized words from its main text, making the passage read: " a multitude of them that were sick, blind, halt, withered. "[36], "For although in the Acts of the Apostles the eunuch is described as at once baptized by Philip, because "he believed with his whole heart," this is not a fair parallel. In printed Bibles this system made its first appearance in the first two Bomberg editions of 1518. If you confess what you've done wrong and ask God, He can help you change your ways. It seems a lot less effort just to add the clarification rather than to argue over what it's reasonable to expect people to know/be able to look up, at such length. Why does Mister Mxyzptlk need to have a weakness in the comics? I checked the Chinese translation it also has the equivalent of "For yours is the kingdom and power and glory, for ever. RV: (omits the words Get thee behind me, Satan:). Metzger speaks of the "inconcinnities" [sic] between the first 8 verses of chapter 16 and the longer ending, and suggests, "all these features indicate that the section was added by someone who knew a form of Mark that ended abruptly with verse 8 and who wished to supply a more appropriate conclusion. KJV: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. [87] The Gospel of St. Mark ends (somewhat abruptly) at end of verse 8 ("for they were afraid.") I have now spent five years studying Gods Word and am more inquisitive than ever before. I am not, of course, arguing that this is the case; I am arguing that there is a great deal of selective evidence used by KJV-only advocates used to support their position. If, on the other hand, there are 100,000 changes to the KJV, that averages out to one out of nearly eight words (1:7.91328 is the precise ratio), or 45.745 words.2 Thus, if my statistics are correct, we should expect to find one or more instances per verse, on average, and a grand total in the double digits. [43], As F.H.A. An additional complication is that no such ", Textus Receptus editions differ among themselves for the inclusion of the. 3 Actually, the ratios are even tighter: the leaf from the 1611 KJV that I looked at begins with changed in 12:20. you will not . Several modern versions similarly relegate those words to a footnote, and some others (such as Moffatt) include the words in the main text but are enclosed in brackets with an explanation in a footnote. [131]9 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience,[132] went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last, and Jesus was left alone, and [with] the woman standing in the midst.10 When Jesus had lift up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, "Woman, where are thine accusers? The verses in . What is a word for the arcane equivalent of a monastery? It may not be an instant, miraculous change, but when you receive God's forgiveness, He will give you strength to change your life. Which just leaves the question of who came up with the variation and why.. whether it's the BHS authors that did. who did it.. As Conybeare described it:[98] "Now in this codex the Gospel of Mark is copied out as far as [i.e., the end of 16:8]. As Bruce M. Metzger puts it, "So far as is known, no Greek witness reads these words at this place; they have been taken from [Acts] 26:14 and 22:10, and are found here in codices of the Vulgate. It was not included in the RSV, but is set forth in a footnote to verse 14 in the NRSV with the comment that "other ancient authorities [sic plural] add, in whole or part". There is power in the Word and we need to keep that in mind when reading and studying the Word of God. Several 1 placed it at the very end of the Gospel of John, and Scrivener adds several more that have so placed a shorter pericope beginning at verse 8:3. . A completely different word is used here than that in verse 15, but the KJV translates both as "according to." It should say, "in proportion to" twice in this verse. At the end of this treatment will be a summary. It only takes a minute to sign up. The deviation from that would then have been when the christian chapters were placed in the hebrew text.. http://charlesasullivan.com/2693/a-history-of-chapters-and-verses-in-the-hebrew-bible/#comment-5436, "The Christian division into chapters, invented by Archbishop Stephen Langton about the beginning of the thirteenth century, has gained an entrance into the Hebrew Bible. Reason: A multitude of books have been devoted to just this verse, including: A Vindication of I John V, 7 from the Objections of M. Griesbach [by Thomas Burgess] (1821, London); Das Comma Ioanneum: Auf Seine Hewrkunft Untersucht [The Johannine Comma, an examination of its origin] by Karl Knstle (1905, Frieburg, Switz. And furthermore, I don't know how accurate it is to say that the WLC has chapter breaks either. But if one is seeking clarity and accuracy, a modern translation is much preferred. KJV: 6 Who also hath gone about to profane the temple: whom we took, and would have judged according to our law.7 But the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took him away out of our hands,8 Commanding his accusers to come unto thee: by examining of whom thyself mayest take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him. The KJV ends the Epistle to the Romans with these verses as 16:2527: KJV: 25 Now to him that is of power to establish you according to my Gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began:26 But now is made manifest, and by the Scriptures of the Prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith,27 To God, only wise, be glory through Jesus Christ, for ever. But KJV-only advocates typically link inspiration to preservation to accessibility in such a way that logically makes printers errors a part of the package. I used to think that the whole God/Satan thing was dreamt up by some good story-teller that, should he have been eligible for royalties would be the richest man in existence! 2 (Introduction) pages 299300. ", In 1891, Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare, while collating several ancient Armenian manuscripts in the library of the monastery at Emiadzin, at the foot of Mount Ararat, in what is now Turkey, found a uncial codex written in the year 986, bound with ivory front and back covers. The shorter version, omitting the doubted phrases in both verses, appears in ,A,B,C,L,W,X,,,,p45,75, but the words do appear (with minor variants) in some slightly later authorities, such as D and K (D contains the phrase in verse 55, but not the phrase in verse 56). LIFT has been changed to LIFTED 51 times. Why do many companies reject expired SSL certificates as bugs in bug bounties? [citation needed], KJV: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. What are the main Differences between KJV and Duoay-Rheims (DRB) / douay-rheims vs kjv / Differences between KJV and DRB Douay-Rheims Version (DRV), Does (Psalm 112:7) Old Testament Hebrew mean "Bad News" Or "Evil Tidings"? Apparently Tischendorff's 1841 Greek NT was the first printed edition to omit this clause. Lets face it, who would think that there was anything spurious about a few missing verses or words. As an example of such a variation, in the KJV verse 9 occurs the phrase, "being convicted by their own conscience," but this phrase did not appear in Erasmus's editions although it appeared in the Complutensian and most subsequent TR editions, nor in most manuscripts that contain this pericope. The first Greek Church Father to mention the pericope in its familiar place was Euthymius, of the 12th century. The battle between good and evil, God and Satan. Target Audience. Bible Search Tips. peter macari age. I think perhaps you misinterpreted one of my sentences.. i'll reword it. The spurious nature of this verse is so notorious[64] that even the Revised Version of 1881 did not bother to include nor provide a footnote for this verse, and many other modern versions do likewise. [see below for a few examples]), but that it has undergone changes100,000 of them. [53] "[71] Aland lays stress on the differences among the Gospel accounts and says, "Even though reads the insertion, the evidence for omission is stronger by far."[72][73]. The KJV is usually taken literally, despite the differences in language. Cyril (born about A.D. 315) - "Read the divine Scriptures - namely, the 22 books of the Old Testament which the 72 interpreters translated" (the Septuagint) The reason for the presence or absence of the brief doxology at the end of the Lord's Prayer is actually liturgical use. ", "Acts 8:37 Faith Before Baptism Omitted in NIV", https://archive.org/stream/thetextandcanon00soutuoft#page/32/mode/2up, "2 Corinthians 13:12 Greet one another with a holy kiss! [115] Yet, out of that small number, 16 words do not appear elsewhere in the Gospel of Mark, 5 words are used here in a different way than used elsewhere in Mark, and 4 phrases do not appear elsewhere in Mark.